Project Summary

developing a tool which provides clear visibility of fractal flow, to unlock capacity, provide clearer status visibility and explore integration of powerful machine learning analysis and targeted data exchange across grid supply points.

Innovation Justification

No current system integrates, visualises, and aggregates power flow across ONO networks or facilitates data exchange between
ESQ and ONO layers. Existing products like Strata Grid might tie a network to a specific platform, risking obsolescence and
single vendor dependency during for DSO transitions and future ESQ requirements.
A key challenge is diverse communication infrastructure and data formats between nodes and network layers, as seen in past
innovation drives [ABCD, NG] and [ANM Good Practice Guide, ENA]. We will deliver a future-proof tool with supplier agnostic
interfaces to unify previous innovation activities, to support the entire network.
Synchronizing communication protocols is also challenging, especially for legacy assets, underscoring the need for a vendor and
protocol-agnostic approach.
Based on market trajectory, local flexibility markets are anticipated. We will develop a future-proof tool to centralise understanding
of sub-network power generation characteristics and help unlock these new market services, while providing powerful data
analytics to support customers and new connections.
Our creative Graph Networks usage establishes a robust data infrastructure, binding data-streams to a virtualized network
structure. This novel data science application offers a fractal-level view of power and network control parameters, featuring data
aggregation and a platform for innovative Machine Learning Functionality. This includes projected reliability of generation asset
clusters through weather API calls, explored in later project phases. The new data structure facilitates GSP data-exchange
between DNOs and ESO.
Adoption of a Graph Network will allow for the integration of innovative features supported by Machine Learning such as:
• Node prediction - optimizes network planning and informs generators and customers about nodal trends.
• Missing Link -- derives performance from associated network connections in case of communication loss.
• Similarity Analysis -- groups similar subgraphs, assessing sub-system performance, identifying systematic issues, and
suggesting performance improvements.
• Risk Monitoring -- uses tailored KPls to evaluate network risks in specific areas.
Moving from Technology Readiness Level 2 to 4 is estimated for Discovery.
Moving from Integration Readiness Level 1 to 2 is estimated as required data relationships betweenGSP and networks nodes
are identified
Determining Commercial Readiness Level forms a key objective for the project, as the tool could benefit power networks
worldwide.
Provision of a future-proofed tool with supplier-agnostic interfaces represents a major step change in the operational and control
capability of the whole network.

Impacts and Benefits

Electricity network limits hinder the integration of Low Carbon Technology (LCT) , constraining renewable energy availability for
customers. Restricted operational information leads to conservative decision-making
These conservatisms and existing ANM control dynamics result in systemic inefficiencies and operational expenses that are
absorbed by customers; e.g. ESQ action balancing measures and an ANM operates to exploit network headroom, negating the
said measures.
The following metrics shall be used within the CBA to report on this position:
• Headroom (MW)
• Generation that can be installed (MW)
• Additional Energy of enabled low carbon generation (MWhr)