This project aims to identify the differences between excavating and repairing a high pressure natural gas pipeline as we do today with a Hydrogen transmission pipeline in the future. Using this information, we want to understand the procedure changes that may be needed for Hydrogen excavation and repair, as well as beginning to identify possible solutions to make these excavations more efficient in terms of safety and cost. This project shall outline the key safety considerations for Hydrogen excavations and therefore determine the requirements for safe and cost-effective Excavations and Repair, for Hydrogen pipelines.
Benefits
Identification of new potential excavation methods that can achieve the same outcome but at a reduced cost from what we currently incur
Learnings
Outcomes
The outcomes of this project are for the majority part unknown at this time, however they will be reported on once found. In terms of what is already known, we know that the process of excavation and repair is unlikely to need significant changes to the way they’re done now, and this may be further improved/ made safer by the use of robotics.
Value tracking
Data Point Data Point Definition
Maturity TRL 2-3 At concept level (NIA Project)
Opportunity 100% of single asset class Buried pipeline
Deployment costs £0 Unknown deployment costs, research project
Innovation cost £330,185 Cost of innovation project
Financial Saving £0 Unknown at the moment- however will be known later after cba
Safety 0 Unknown but project will be able to contribute to safe hydrogen practices
Environment 0.0 Unknown at the moment- may be able to understand for cba and will be able to contribute to hydrogen network development
Compliance Supports compliance Will help us comply with future hydrogen related safety regulations
Skills & Competencies Departmental Shall develop competencies from construction department
Future proof Supports business strategy Supports the growth of a hydrogen network
The predicted net benefits will be:
- Highlight areas of concern for further work to do with working safely with hydrogen on the excavation and repair process.
- Identification of new potential excavation methods that can achieve the same outcome, but at a reduced cost from what is currently incurred.
Lessons Learnt
The predominant lessons from this project come from work packages 2 and 3. The final reports are still being altered for these, so a complete look at next steps cannot be given at this time. From the work package 2 report, apart from differences in the risk assessment with hydrogen being present in the pipe, there were no extra risks that came out of the report relating to this process to the point that these processes should be done in a different way. Further to this in work package 3, which complements work package 2, there is a potential basis to not only use some of the technologies researched for the current methane network but also to use them in the hydrogen network to increase safety and efficiency. The TRL level of technologies identified for the repair process were minimal and only in the lowest TRL levels. With the excavation process, many were identified and when we are able to see the cost benefit analysis done in work package 4, we will hopefully be able to identify the ones which would be the most suitable to research further.